Wednesday, 4 February 2015

Monday, 2 February 2015

Aruba Networks Deflects Shareholder Suit Over Cisco Threat


SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge cancels the securities fraud claims against a provider of wireless services in Silicon Valley on Monday, ruling there is no evidence the company or its executives have made false or misleading statements to shareholders.

The ruling is a victory for Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati lawyers representing lawyers had argued Inc.Plaintiffs Aruba Networks executives Sunnyvale company hides the threat posed by rival Cisco Systems Inc. But after giving the plaintiffs two possibilities to change its complaint, the district judge Vince Chhabria the Northern District of California dismissed the claim with statements made by prejudice.The Aruba executives, though perhaps a bit "squirrely, were not as harmful or misleading applicants will say, wrote in an order of five pages.

Plaintiffs lawyers Gold Bennett Cera and Sidener had accused the defendants of concealing the success of Cisco sales campaign, which included the price reduction, bundling your wired and wireless products and providing updates data centers. Aruba, which does not sell products with cable, could not compete with the supply of complete package Cisco promoted. However, plaintiffs attorneys wrote, executive Aruba kept his company was the leader of technology on Cisco, and said that we are winning almost every deal we see.

But Chhabria wrote that the plaintiffs have not presented any evidence of those boots were false and that Aruba was losing market share Cisco.Furthermore, Cisco was no secret was a formidable competitor, Chhabria written. Aruba executives told shareholders expect competition to intensify in the future, Cisco and listed as one of the largest and well established business partner competitors.Wilson Sonsini Ignacio Salceda and advice Diane Walters represent Aruba.

300-101 Sample Question : 4

QUESTION 4:

Scenario:
You have been asked to evaluate an OSPF network setup in a test lab and to answer questions a customer has about its operation. The customer has disabled your access to the show runningconfig command.


Which of the following statements is true about the serial links that terminate in R3

A. The R1-R3 link needs the neighbor command for the adjacency to stay up
B. The R2-R3 link OSPF timer values are 30, 120, 120
C. The R1-R3 link OSPF timer values should be 10,40,40
D. R3 is responsible for flooding LSUs to all the routers on the network.

Answer: B

Explanation:

We can see the configured timers using the following command:


Monday, 5 January 2015

300-101 Sample Question : 3

Question : 3

Which traffic does the following configuration allow?
ipv6 access-list cisco
permit ipv6 host 2001:DB8:0:4::32 any eq ssh
line vty 0 4 ipv6 access-class cisco in

A. all traffic to vty 0 4 from source 2001:DB8:0:4::32
B. only ssh traffic to vty 0 4 from source all
C. only ssh traffic to vty 0 4 from source 2001:DB8:0:4::32
D. all traffic to vty 0 4 from source all

Answer : C